Pain across the forehead does not reliably distinguish migraine, tension-type headache and sinus-related pain. The more useful comparison combines the sensation, effect of ordinary movement, accompanying symptoms and course over time. Migraine can include nasal symptoms, so a blocked nose does not automatically establish a sinus infection. 1

Seek emergency help for a sudden, unusually severe headache, new weakness, speech difficulty, confusion or abrupt vision loss. Do not use the comparison below to explain away an unfamiliar neurological symptom. 2

Appointment worksheets

Compare a pattern, not one body part

Feature to describe Migraine can involve Tension-type headache often involves Sinus-related pain requires context
Pain quality Throbbing or pulsating pain Pressure or tightness Facial pressure or tenderness
Everyday movement Can make the pain worse Usually does not make it worse Bending-related pain alone is not distinctive
Associated symptoms Nausea, light or sound sensitivity; sometimes aura A different pattern from the usual migraine combination A preceding respiratory illness, discolored discharge, reduced smell or upper-tooth pain can be relevant
Location Often one side, but not exclusively Commonly both sides Forehead or facial location does not prove infection

These are tendencies from clinical descriptions, not diagnostic criteria for a home test. A clinician considers the complete history and other possible causes. 231

The table deliberately does not allocate points. A scoring system assembled from a few common features could give false reassurance without examining the person or considering an unusual presentation.

Why the “sinus headache” label can be misleading

Mayo explains that migraine may produce congestion, watery nasal discharge and facial pressure. Those symptoms overlap with what people call a sinus headache. Conversely, the fact that migraine can cause congestion does not mean every episode of facial pain is migraine. 1

For an appointment, distinguish “I felt pressure here” from “a clinician confirmed sinus disease.” The first is an observation; the second is a diagnostic conclusion. Mixing them can make the treatment history confusing: a clinician needs to know what was actually established before deciding what to investigate now.

Avoid drawing a treatment conclusion from the location alone. “Behind the eyes” is a useful description to report, but it is not a reason to choose an antibiotic, repeat an old prescription or dismiss a new vision problem.

Separate the headache from everything around it

A useful account has four short parts:

Before: What was happening before the pain—an illness, a medication change, visual symptoms or an ordinary day?

During: Was the experience pressure, throbbing or something else? What happened with light, sound, movement and the ability to eat or drink?

After: Did the pain end while fatigue or other symptoms continued? Were there completely symptom-free periods?

Change: How does this differ from earlier episodes that a clinician assessed?

These are communication prompts, not required evidence before seeking help. Approximate timing is acceptable. “I cannot remember” is more useful than inventing a precise duration.

A worked example of better history—not a diagnosis

Consider this fictional note:

“I have had three episodes this month. The pain is across my forehead. I also feel sick and want a dark room. My nose runs during the episode. Between episodes the nasal symptoms disappear. These attacks are different from the cold I had last winter.”

That account gives a clinician more to evaluate than “my sinus headache is back.” It does not prove migraine. Its value is that it preserves the observations instead of hiding them inside an assumed cause.

A second useful note might say, “This is the first headache like this, and it started suddenly.” That changes the urgency of the conversation; it should not be held for a routine diary review.

What to ask about the plan

Ask which findings support the working diagnosis, which alternatives need consideration, and what would change the assessment. Then distinguish the plan for a current attack from a plan to reduce future attacks. Our migraine treatment guide explains that difference.

Also bring the names and dates of every headache medicine used, including nonprescription combinations. A calendar is more informative than “I take something quite often.” The medicine-day guide explains how to prepare that record without deciding your own withdrawal plan.

The goal is not to find the most persuasive label online. It is to describe the pattern accurately enough that the next clinical decision addresses the actual problem.